Political history in the Democratic Republic of Congo has frequently followed a grim pattern: calls for civil action usually result in Kinshasa being engulfed by tear gas, gunfire, and the threat of widespread looting. However, the recent “Ville morte” (Dead City) operation on June 3, 2026, has shattered this cycle of violence. Moving past partisan divides and statistical debates, one clear truth emerges: non-violence prevailed, marking a significant milestone in the maturation of our nation’s democracy.
With zero fatalities, no injuries, and no reports of vandalism, this absence of chaos was not accidental. Instead, it reflects two major shifts in the political landscape of the RDC.
First, it demonstrates the restraint and accountability of the current administration. State institutions successfully navigated the difficult task of maintaining public order while respecting fundamental liberties. Second, it highlights the wisdom of the Congolese people, who now refuse to be used as sacrificial pawns for political agendas. Citizens demonstrated a clear ability to balance their grievances with the practical necessity of daily economic survival.
The coexistence of freedoms
The most striking aspect of the day was the visible exercise of competing rights. Opposition figures such as Martin Fayulu and Moïse Katumbi were able to broadcast their calls for a civic boycott without facing censorship. Simultaneously, the government, through a clear directive from Jean-Pierre Lihau, the Vice-Prime Minister and Minister of Civil Service, emphasized the importance of maintaining public services. What we witnessed on the ground was a vibrant, pluralistic democracy in full swing.
While some residents chose to stay home in protest, others went about their business as usual. A powerful symbol of this newfound tolerance was the normal operation of the Faden House hotel. Despite its association with a prominent opposition leader, the establishment remained untouched, proving that Kinshasa has moved beyond the era of petty political retaliation. Those who wished to protest through absence did so, while those who chose to work were equally free to do so. Property remained secure, and individual rights were upheld across the board.
In a healthy democracy, success is not measured by the number of shuttered shops or burning tires. Rather, it is defined by a system’s ability to accommodate dissent without collapsing into disorder. By protecting everyone’s safety, the right to protest, and the right to work, the RDC has shown it is no longer a playground for instability. It is a nation growing through dialogue and mutual respect.
While political rhetoric may fade, these tangible facts remain. This time, we can say with genuine pride: long live democracy!
